Let’s think before words, God is dangerous because he know how to limit itself and is by essence reality itself, self contained in it’s deity in microsome that is us in our being and flesh.
The positive existence of Evil doesn’t exist but we often can’t and won’t see the negative existence of god until it become absolutely positive, well we’ll do it very simply with examples:
- Self-sacrifice for the common good
- A death that create changes and revolution
- A person that got a new job
Imagine that reality is always relative and the consensus behind it would rather say that if a majority think something similarly, trough the weight of perception, it will become the norm of absoluteness. Scientific are persuaded that we can’t say if we are living in a simulation or not or even if the real, well, really is real, that said: Truth must be experienced and throughout comparing it with other we achieve to believe in the result of a subtle consensus.
We will probably agree on the first point, sometimes you have to help yourself in order to help others meanwhile sometimes you need to forget about yourself in order to truly help others. Working for the common good brings happiness to the ego, but you can say that sometimes it self-sacrifice for the common good could be slavery. OK, I may be a bit harsh so let’s say that it will mostly be thoughts of positive existence of god if we work for the common good throughout actions in others lives or in one own’s life if it doesn’t trade a problem for another.
Now let think about the negative existence of god, how would this side would be able to attract you in one of it’s plan? Let’s say that good and bad are evaluated by emotions, if you feel better than the average, it is good, if you don’t feel better than the average it’s bad. Would you feel better after the cleansing of a very negative network of devilish action, if it would be in touch with you? Probably? OK let’s imagine that god can limit itself and has a positive along with a negative side of it’s deity.
Would you, in order to improve the resilience of good, create evil? Humanly maybe not but let’s do not talk about it, let’s stay human. The matter of fact is that good and evil does exist, in fact, at least for those who can make a difference between both.
Because of the existence of evil, good would be limited as evil really is too.
With limited means of creating changes, how would you help the positive existence of god to create change in order to sanitise a network of organised action? Maybe trough pushing people to react if a death occurs because of this “network”, so would you think that god would be able to create some death in order to push more changes to reality than without such. Well if you’re a normal human probably not, but if you’re not so simple at side, maybe you’ll think that this could be a new concept called the negative existence of god.
Let’s imagine that the negative and positive existence of god talk to each other, what would the positive would say to the negative in order to avoid some martyrs to create changes? Can we agree on some action that would trigger a signification change that would be able to equals a death?
Could the positive existence of god push one’s will to make something that would save him from the will of the negative existence of god (Passing over the threshold of results that make it better to be in god’s negative plans)? If yes, well, you’ll be taken back by the positive to stay alive and if you can’t you’ll maybe face the negative existence of god, in the aftermath, everything is made for the positive existence of god that’s why god has the power to limit itself but let’s say that the negative existence of god can make you learn things better than the positive existence of god, and that’s why we always need to keep fate.
Addition:
The negative side of god can also be better understood with a minimal variety, let’s get into it: the control of chaos is important for god, prophecies exist in order to reduce chaos, it creates charming history, let’s imagine a prophecy which is about throwing an enemy into the sea (hidden or not, like Bin Laden), the story will be better managed and therefore will be more useful to god. What we can understand is that you have to consider the mystic part of a story to tell it to reality and therefore you have to provide a variety absorbing an other variety (lack of chaos variety absorbed by a story) but even if some of the stories can be classed in the negative existence of god, it doesn’t mean that evil is different and also exist, thus, follow the light or you will get fooled, for superior forces are way too hard to understand and counter by it’s opposing equalling variety.
Systematically creating an homage to specifics perpetrators of victims will create a change in the environment that will lead to a predictable future state of a special variety which will means that an opposing variety will have to equals it in order to absorb all the initial variety. Such homage may increase the difficulty for such things to happen but it must be systematic and of a special useful reaction.
I can’t explain this dimension, it is too complex and obscure for the mind to understand, but think of it as a chemical reaction, for the same results you can take different path and depending on what you add to your chemical reaction it will have a different results. Future events and their reaction can be absorbed by creating an equalling variety.
